Hacker News
new
|
past
|
comments
|
ask
|
show
|
jobs
|
submit
login
corvad
19 hours ago
|
parent
|
context
|
favorite
| on:
GitHub Incident
I suspect some companies may already be considering it. Especially with the wealth of alternatives today.
g947o
18 hours ago
|
next
[–]
Companies are already using on-premise GitHub server, if they are using GitHub in the first place. There are many other self hosted solutions which are quite common in enterprise environment.
reply
supriyo-biswas
18 hours ago
|
prev
|
next
[–]
In my experience companies are
moving into
GitHub for Copilot and GHA.
reply
appplication
18 hours ago
|
parent
|
next
[–]
GHA maybe, but copilot is just another mid tier player in a congested space.
reply
NewJazz
16 hours ago
|
root
|
parent
|
next
[–]
Doesn't stop folks from wanting to buy the MS brand. Execs are really out of touch these days.
reply
ChromaticPanic
11 hours ago
|
root
|
parent
|
prev
|
next
[–]
It's a
cheap
mid tier player. You get more tokens per dollar.
reply
nine_k
19 hours ago
|
prev
[–]
What kind of alternatives do you see as viable for large(ish) commercial users?
reply
toephu2
18 hours ago
|
parent
[–]
GitHub on-prem. Officially called GitHub Enterprise Server. You can have GitHub, but hosted on your own servers.
reply
NewJazz
18 hours ago
|
root
|
parent
[–]
So you still pay them, you do the hosting work, and you get a product with worse features than gitlab?
reply
johnisgood
2 hours ago
|
root
|
parent
|
next
[–]
Yeah, at that point why would anyone choose GitHub?
reply
bigfatkitten
2 hours ago
|
root
|
parent
|
prev
|
next
[–]
And it costs you more money than GitLab.
reply
zxcvasd
18 hours ago
|
root
|
parent
|
prev
[–]
but you can be smug when theres a github incident, and thats hard to put a price on
reply
NewJazz
16 hours ago
|
root
|
parent
[–]
You can do that with gitlab.
reply
Guidelines
|
FAQ
|
Lists
|
API
|
Security
|
Legal
|
Apply to YC
|
Contact
Search: