I don't understand why you consider this to be a meaningful number. It isn't even a probability any more; it's just a dimensionless ratio.
In your example, your result is 2. That alone tells me it cannot be a probability, as those numbers are restricted to the domain from zero to one.
If you partition the population by sex, the probability of randomly selecting a good engineer from the all-male group is only 0.8% higher than picking from the all-female group. That is the advantage you realize by selecting that criterion for your partition. If you are taking a ratio of conditional probabilities, you are no longer partitioning the probability space by that condition.
In your example, your result is 2. That alone tells me it cannot be a probability, as those numbers are restricted to the domain from zero to one.
If you partition the population by sex, the probability of randomly selecting a good engineer from the all-male group is only 0.8% higher than picking from the all-female group. That is the advantage you realize by selecting that criterion for your partition. If you are taking a ratio of conditional probabilities, you are no longer partitioning the probability space by that condition.