In his defense he has apologized like 600 times on twitter so far. Im sure it was a genuine mistake just getting carried away in moment. Twitter makes that kind of easy I suppose.
Sure. But in those 600 times, is there evidence of him learning something? Contrast it with Corey Haines's apology, where he talked about how it violated his principles, that his specific mistake was forgetting that there are always people behind software. That's the sort of lesson-learning that I thought was missing from Steve Kalabnik's post.
