Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Unfortunately (fortunately?) it does not have like 60% failure rate. Yes, there’s some non-negligible error rate. But it’s lower than the threshold that would make the average user throw it into the bin. We can pretend that’s not the case, but it doesn’t even pass the real life sniff test.


You don't know when it's wrong.


People used to say the same things about Wikipedia. They weren't wrong. Still aren't. But it sort of misses the point.


That's an entirely different system because it's quite transparent


Sure, well cited LLM output is better than opaque. You still don't immediately know when it's wrong though. Same as Wikipedia.

Despite that, both are incredibly useful if used correctly.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: