You merely assume an alternative implementation strategy exists and that it provides the same value to the user.

But that says nothing about whether it actually can exist.

> You merely assume an alternative implementation strategy exists [...]

Huh, where am I making that assumption?

> But that says nothing about whether it actually can exist.

Yes, I expressed no opinion on that.

> Huh, where am I making that assumption?

You didn't, and you didn't express any opinion on whether or not it can exist, either - GP is arguing dishonestly to shill Rust.

Which is really a shame. Rust is a nice enough language that it doesn't need dishonest shilling.