Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I'd be fascinated to have a breakdown of what all the ICs are on the motherboard. Like are they mostly ASICs, or mostly discrete logic, like level shifters, gate drivers, shift registers and the like?

Either way, it's amazing to think that basically every non-power related chip on that board is now inside a modern chipset IC.



The schematic is right there in the repo so I randomly googled some of the part numbers:

LS125 - 3-state bus buffers - https://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/sn54ls125a.pdf?ts=17314810...

LS612 - Memory mappers - https://media.digikey.com/pdf/Data%20Sheets/Rochester%20PDFs...

8259 - Interrupt controller - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_8259

27C256 - ROM - https://ww1.microchip.com/downloads/aemDocuments/documents/O...

Most of it is somewhat more high-level than the 7400-series ICs and such you might find in something older like the early 6502-based microcomputer motherboards.


The current design uses several CPLD for address decoding instead of original parts.

An FPGA is planned for the remaining AT controllers, which are now hard to source:

- the 2x 8237 DMA controller

- the 2x 8259 Interrupt controller

- the 8254 System timer

This will allow anyone to build a modern AT, like this was done for the XT.

Follow the discussion here: https://forum.vcfed.org/index.php?threads/project-to-create-...


Not sure about the rest, but I thought it was funny that the 80286 CPU is among the smallest chips on the board - that's probably due to the PLCC (?) packaging, while most of the others are DIP, but still...

The only other PLCC-packaged chips are two ATF1508AS, which are indeed ASICs (CPLDs) - oh, and the 53C400, which is... a SCSI controller (probably added as a bonus?!).


>I thought it was funny that the 80286 CPU is among the smallest chips on the board - that's probably due to the PLCC (?) packaging, while most of the others are DIP

That's basically it. The 286 has a much larger wafer inside than a typical DIP, and DIPs are extremely inefficient packages.

It would be interesting to see how much you could shrink this board down if all these chips were replaced with BGAs (using the same wafers inside). Obviously, that's not really feasible (no one is selling a BGA version of an 8259 interrupt controller, much less an 80286), but it would be interesting to see the dramatic size reduction, just from packaging waste. Also interesting would be if you designed a board using BGA versions of all these chips, but fabbed on modern IC processes (thus yielding much smaller wafers. and therefore somewhat smaller BGA packages). Of course, the whole thing could probably just be implemented with a single FPGA these days.


TBH that's nothing new... for instance, it takes a while to find the 68020 CPU on the Amiga 1200 mainboard: https://bigbookofamigahardware.com/bboah/media/download_phot...


Just a note, CPLDs (and the more modern replacements, FPGAs) are kind of the opposite of ASICs by definition.

They are obviously ICs, but being programmable they’re general purpose, not application specific (the AS in ASIC).




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: