There's a clear distinction between "We are mandated by the court to maintain plaintext for all accounts for all time" and "We are mandated by the court to have the capability to maintain plaintext for one account when ordered so by subpoena-or-equivalent". This is the latter.
Arguments can be had about the relevance of that distinction, but relevant or not, the distinction does exist. Thanks for clarifying!
(I'm not participating in the "Is this distinction relevant?" discussion today, sorry, just trying to understand what was passed. See other threads for pro/con arguments.)
Arguments can be had about the relevance of that distinction, but relevant or not, the distinction does exist. Thanks for clarifying!
(I'm not participating in the "Is this distinction relevant?" discussion today, sorry, just trying to understand what was passed. See other threads for pro/con arguments.)