If you wrote public answers on questions of sex, why should they be hidden? --You made your answers public intentionally and also provided the answers intentionally so others would hopefully learn from them. Additionally, you did both while knowing your name is attached to them. In other words, you want to be known both for and by your contributions.
If you did not wish to be known for and by your public contributions, then the only answer is to either not make public contributions, or go to rather extreme lengths to only make public contributions anonymously. The latter fraught with plenty of caveats to maintain anonymity correctly, so the only real answer is to only make public contributions you would want attributed to you.
Back in the 80's when Chico State was the number 1 party school in the US, recruiters would show up in droves looking to get new employees. The unstated reason was very simple; if someone could graduate from Chico, it pretty much proved the person could not only get things done but also have a really fun time doing it.
Who would you rather work with? --A fiercely academic but socially limited graduate, or the guy who can get stuff done and also do keg stands?
If I searched on your name and found your public opinions, I'd think far more of you for having the stones to make your own contributions than I would be concerned about your predilection for midget porn.
Of course, the trouble with trying to be non-judgmental and unbiased is assuming others will do the same.
If you wrote public answers on questions of sex, why should they be hidden? --You made your answers public intentionally and also provided the answers intentionally so others would hopefully learn from them. Additionally, you did both while knowing your name is attached to them. In other words, you want to be known both for and by your contributions.
If you did not wish to be known for and by your public contributions, then the only answer is to either not make public contributions, or go to rather extreme lengths to only make public contributions anonymously. The latter fraught with plenty of caveats to maintain anonymity correctly, so the only real answer is to only make public contributions you would want attributed to you.
Back in the 80's when Chico State was the number 1 party school in the US, recruiters would show up in droves looking to get new employees. The unstated reason was very simple; if someone could graduate from Chico, it pretty much proved the person could not only get things done but also have a really fun time doing it.
Who would you rather work with? --A fiercely academic but socially limited graduate, or the guy who can get stuff done and also do keg stands?
If I searched on your name and found your public opinions, I'd think far more of you for having the stones to make your own contributions than I would be concerned about your predilection for midget porn.
Of course, the trouble with trying to be non-judgmental and unbiased is assuming others will do the same.