I wrote a computer program which proves this article is wrong.
It avoids exponential runtime by assuming that because newspapers mostly make a mishmash of science articles, that you only need to look at some of the words before deciding whether they made a mishmash of this article.
It's not 100% true, but it's quite true.
It avoids exponential runtime by assuming that because newspapers mostly make a mishmash of science articles, that you only need to look at some of the words before deciding whether they made a mishmash of this article. It's not 100% true, but it's quite true.
...