Also all of this is assuming that any duplicated content is inherently stolen, w... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		alwaysdoit on Nov 2, 2015 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: Google doesn't recognise or penalise stolen conten... Also all of this is assuming that any duplicated content is inherently stolen, when it could in fact be public domain, fair use, legitimately licensed, distributed under Creative Commons, etc.

blfr on Nov 2, 2015 [–]

True, but in these cases I would still want original/canonical/fastest/best source first while the others are probably only valuable as backups.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact