Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I understand that you're proposing something hypothetical. So let's assume that it's true: Mississippi needs the revenue to run the prisons.

The federal government should be able to say, "No, sorry Mississippi, you aren't going to run your prisons on the backs of the families of inmates."

Why should someone have to pay extortionist prices to speak to a loved one? They likely had nothing to do with the crime (or the criminality of the inmate), and it's not fair to punish them just for being unlucky enough to love someone who becomes a convict.



I'm pretty sure that the loved ones of prisoners are being punished (by, you know, being physically separated from the prisoners) regardless of the cost of phone calls. Again, I'm not saying you're wrong. Were I a Mississippian, I'd prolly be in favor of cheaper phone calls for prisoners. But aren't we drawing a line in kind of a weird place?

  - OK to lock someone up in a cage.
  - OK to charge them $0.11/minute to talk to someone outside of that cage.
  - NOT OK to charge $1/minute to talk to someone outside of that cage.
And given how weird that line is, should it really be drawn by outsiders who feel no effects of where the line is drawn?


> And given how weird that line is, should it really be drawn by outsiders who feel no effects of where the line is drawn?

Yes. That how treating humans humanely works.


Why are outsiders better equipped to decide what is and is not humane than members of the actual community in question?


Because human rights are, as they say, "inalienable"; the local community doesn't get to vote on them.


Inexpensive phone calls are a human right?

Keep in mind this wasn't a ruling by SCOTUS citing the constitution. It was a ruling by the FCC meaning that ultimately it WAS a community voting on them. The only debate here is the size of the community that should get a vote.


You are free to your opinion. Preventing someone from keeping in touch with their family while they're in prison through extortion-level pricing of communications services is violating their rights, and the FCC appears to agree. If it has to go to SCOTUS, so be it.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: