Curl, according to the authors own admission, is the most heavily tested and fuzzed open source library out there. So I think for him it's a different situation

>soaked passengers will want a refund

This is so funny. I can imagine customers floating along in their Waymo thinking, "wow I need a refund for this".

The pelican is ready to discuss increased synergies of bringing AI to all teams at the firm!

Wrong question.

Right question: What exactly is Google's plan for the long term pricing of these models, and are we all going to be priced out in a year?

Yikes. I think the concept of a 'flash' model is changing, no? Google used to market this as its lower-intelligence, faster, cheaper option. I appreciate that they are delivering on both of those, but personally I would appreciate if they could create an incremental knowledge improvement while holding price steady. Fortune 500 companies have to make their money I guess.

I think flash just means "fast" now

Real smart. I’ve come to associate ”Flash” with ”useless make-shit-up”, and always look for Thinking/Pro when I see it set. Now, suddenly, there is only Flash?

My guess is Gemini Pro coming later will be 2x more, bringing it comparable to Opus’s pricing.

That would be Flash Lite now, and I'm also interested in the cheaper end of things so kinda disappointed they didn't release 3.5 Flash Lite at the same time...

Does it crash for anyone? Antigravity used to be rock solid for me, but now I can't even authenticate when it opens. 2.0 Bricked me

Most of the responses on the X thread are people having the same issue

Don't hate me, I do agree with the premise of the article (I really do!) but I can’t help but notice:

>The issue was never that AI could help. proceeds to write the next 3 sentences about how the problem IS in fact ai help

>Teams that refused to use AI were not just missing a convenience; they were playing a slower version of the competition.

>CTFs were not just a set of puzzles. They were a ladder.

>The claim is not that every challenge is solved. The claim is that...

>The loss is not just a scoreboard. It is the ladder from

Guys I'm so sorry I just can't stop noticing stuff like this. Anyone else?

I got some AI writing vibes too, but looking closer, I think it might be human-written (or at least partly so) - perhaps just picking up some AI conversation styles? FWIW, Pangram gives it a mixed but mostly-human score too. Maybe AI is not just changing the way we speak; it's changing the way we perceive all writing ;)

This wasn't @fc417fc802's dichotomy, it was the person above them who posted. They were responding to another comment which assumed this

Yeah this would be different. Also let me tell you my approach so I disconnected my car's data connectivity unit and all that does is forward the signal from the cell antennas down to the main head unit. So by disconnecting it my car doesn't actually know that it cell service has been turned off it literally just thinks there is no signal right now.

So the authors goal is to reduce his car's ability to transmit his data to Toyota.

His solution: disconnect the cell modem

Your solution: Be single, never drive a car ever, and leave your phone at home.

?????

Honey.