> Yeah, so when we will have vacuum cooled below 0K, it will confirm existence of ether.
I think you will face great difficulties in convincing anyone that works in the topic area of this.
> Yes, I asserting very minority view in physics, but I'm able to back it with video of real experiment. It is not a hand waving.
It's clear you do not understand the propagation of acoustically excited droplets are a limited analogy, not a perfect model of QM/QFT. The people doing those experiments would not agree with your statements or characterizations.
> Let be honest. The quick way to check understanding of something is to ask "why?" few times. People, who dedicates their entire lives to relativistic and/or quantum physics, are not able to answer even to single "why?". It's because of orthodox education.
This is willful arrogant ignorance and a gross mischaracterization of the world of physicists. They absolutely address more than "a single why?". You have not put forth the effort necessary to understand the broadly accepted answer, let alone invalidate it.
I think you will face great difficulties in convincing anyone that works in the topic area of this.
> Yes, I asserting very minority view in physics, but I'm able to back it with video of real experiment. It is not a hand waving.
It's clear you do not understand the propagation of acoustically excited droplets are a limited analogy, not a perfect model of QM/QFT. The people doing those experiments would not agree with your statements or characterizations.
> Let be honest. The quick way to check understanding of something is to ask "why?" few times. People, who dedicates their entire lives to relativistic and/or quantum physics, are not able to answer even to single "why?". It's because of orthodox education.
This is willful arrogant ignorance and a gross mischaracterization of the world of physicists. They absolutely address more than "a single why?". You have not put forth the effort necessary to understand the broadly accepted answer, let alone invalidate it.