Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Duh. The important thing at this instant is to develop a self-sufficient extra-terrestrial colony or a means by which some people can survive far above the surface of the Earth for 30-80 years. Life on Earth itself has less time than most people are even ready to know. Something on the order of 1-10 years left. There are massive changes coming which will destroy all human civilization on Earth. Global warming is just the first step. It's like a fever in a human. 1-3°C is no big deal. 3-5°C is extremely serious. We're talking massive tectonic activity, volcanoes, and huge tsunami(s) caused by a huge wave of energy originating from Earth's core. This situation is caused by a problem in the circulation of the gravity field. I've met many scientists but aside from even finding people who understand this topic, I have barely even found anyone who genuinely wants to know either. And this is the very reason this phenomenon of collapse is determined to appear in this age of mankind.


Earth has been warmer before without all the catastrophic effects you describe

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:EPICA_temperature_plot.sv...


The point is not the temperature itself, although my simplified description implied that. It's the fact that human activities are causing and have caused the natural environment to lose its homeostatic balance and to do so very quickly. This fact generates the catastrophic effects, not the resting temperature of the planet.


Fascinating. Do you have any sources on this? I'm interested in learning more.


Please see my reply to veeragoni.


Aaaaand it's a bunch of unsubstantiated spiritualist gibberish. Oh well.


That hurts, because you lied about being interested in learning, giving me a little expectation about you – and you also don't admit the truth because of your pride. I need to find only a small handful of people from your life in order for everyone else to realize your true color.

Obviously, you're used to hearing similar words to what I said from those who don't know a thing. However, in order for you, yourself, to avoid become a hypocrite, you need to not make the mistake you accuse me of doing. So, perhaps you could present proof that what I shared is unsubstantiated. It's to your detriment to treat it badly without confirmation.


For one, because it's a single source. It's very elaborate literature, to be sure, but so is the Book of Mormon.

I am indeed interested in learning, but only if the thing to be learned is the truth. The burden of proof is not on me to disprove a collection of writings that boil down to "X and Y and Z are true because this guy said so".

So let me rephrase the original question, then: what sorts of things can an ordinary person such as myself independently observe to come to the same conclusions as your source material and thus "admit the truth" in which you seem to believe?


In order to confirm truths, you absolutely need to formulate concrete, realistic (factual) problems/questions. And then you need to put those questions on the principle and check their result in reality.

That there is something I learned from that man and is the answer to your question. The question now is whether you can understand, accept, and practice it.

If you can practice the above fact and you are able to ask real questions, you will realize every truth and obtain everything you want.

If you cannot, you will quickly change into a worse person as your decision there causes you to form a relationship in your consciousness with having discarded the most important opportunity in your life despite believing the lie that you did the right thing – and that relationship which comes to stay within your consciousness will continue to affect your life, causing you to repeat the same thing continuously.

By the way, everything he teaches indicates "don't believe what people say. don't believe your own thoughts. don't believe what you think you understood from me. confirm everything for yourself and don't believe it until after confirmation." He even says that very clearly in a few places.

Regardless of the fact that he was one man observing the things he observed, the source of his truth is facts, not his own words, thoughts, or ideas – which he never told others. If you checked before believing your thoughts about him, you would have been able to notice that.

As you said you are interested in truth, rather than wanting something else out of him like how to be successful, I will tell you one thing. If you have a lie in your consciousness – which you invariably believe without your realization – you will not be able to understand his words correctly at all. The reason is that things which lie latent in your consciousness combined with your ignorance of the matter will interfere with your ability to perceive the definitions of the words and cause you to reject what you didn't understand before you can confirm. So it's not possible to be able to learn things just by your own thoughts. It requires that you first abandon your existing knowledge and secondly confirm the facts.

So if you are actually interested (and you can confirm that you are interested instead of it being the narrative that you feel best telling yourself) and you put in a little effort you can confirm everything he says. He taught that when we tell others something that we haven't confirmed and which they can't realize/confirm, it becomes lying. And I challenge you to find even a single lie in anything he said. If you can I will give you everything of mine, including my head, if you would like, and I will not follow him anymore.

He traveled over 50 countries and met thousands upon thousands of extremely smart, top intellectuals, politicians, scientists, religious/spiritual leaders, etc. He confirmed his truth through his encounters with them and through their own knowledge and information. No one could answer his 10 questions but he was never unable to answer even a single person's questions. It would be a very silly mistake for you to think you know that there's just "one source" there.

Besides, I learned from him and I'm a great proof that I have obtained enough ability to not be defeated in debate by anyone alive today. Go ahead and ask me the hardest questions you want to – I will give you the correct, verifiable answer. Meanwhile I can ask you any number of questions and I know you won't be able to answer them. Like I said above, I am willing to bet my life. So I would advise you to re-check before you let yourself accept your initial assumption that you understood the situation correctly.


> He taught that when we tell others something that we haven't confirmed and which they can't realize/confirm, it becomes lying.

This "teaching" is dangerously similar to "Russell's teapot" (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russell%27s_teapot).

> Meanwhile I can ask you any number of questions and I know you won't be able to answer them.

Unlike you, I do not pretend to have all of the answers to every question.


It may be ridiculous that I claim to be able to answer anything you could throw my way. But it is more ridiculous that a self proclaimed learner and truthseeker doesnt attempt to verify someone who claims to be able to see the way to fulfill their wishes. Anyway, you can and will have whatever you want.


It's not ridiculous to not want to chase yet another spiritualist rabbit-hole. These sorts of "teachers" in whom you seem to believe are a dime a dozen.

I don't "attempt to verify" this someone because there's nothing to verify, and because even if there was something to verify, there's very little tangible reason to do so compared to the hundreds of other extant (let alone extinct) spiritual belief systems in the world today.

So unless you can - in all your wisdom - tell me what I had for lunch today, I reckon our conversation here to not be worth continuing. Nothing against you specifically - I'm sure your belief in this particular prophet is sincere - but rather the notion that any sane person would follow a road that is clearly a dead-end.


> I don't "attempt to verify" this someone because there's nothing to verify, and because even if there was something to verify, there's very little tangible reason to do so compared to the hundreds of other extant (let alone extinct) spiritual belief systems in the world today.

Useless words and obviously self-contradictory. How do you know the benefit until you have verified the content? This is just getting silly...


You scare me when you say 1 to 10 years. I want to change. Please provide more info,stats and material to inspire people to change. Atleast,what should i can do in the immediate term


Hi, If you genuinely want how to change then the essential information you have to know is that this world operates by one fundamental principle which means that everything, including the Earth, makes results on the basis of what is in problems. To change yourself you first need to become properly aware of yourself and any problem you have, and then you need to formulate good problems for yourself through 'what is' in reality. Same process for changing others. Problem is that before being able to become aware of 'what is' correctly and precisely you either need an extremely long time of practicing good deeds or you need to learn from a truthful teacher who has already opened his own eyes to the world. Those teachers are extremely rare. However I found one about a decade ago. He talks about the coming changes to humanity only generally in public but he traveled to dozens of countries and has met and had recorded conversations with scientists at hundreds of the world's top universities. Here's an English website about his work. Sorry that it is so late. He passed away already in 2008, else you would have been able to personally ask him questions.

http://tathagata2000.tripod.com




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: